The finger problems: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
added link to page Drexler-Smalley debate on molecular nanotechnology |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Stub}} | {{Stub}} | ||
{{wikitodo|Add historic context}} | {{wikitodo|Add historic context.}} | ||
[[File:StickyFatJitteryFinger.png|200px|thumb|right|Fun little sketch just for quick visual recognition of the page]][[File:FingerStiffnessSpectrum_and_FoldamerTypes_.svg|400px|thumb|right|Illustration of aspects of the [[fat finger problem]]. More info on the linked page.]] | |||
'''The classic ones:''' | '''The classic ones:''' | ||
| Line 13: | Line 14: | ||
== Related == | == Related == | ||
* [[Drexler-Smalley debate on molecular nanotechnology]] | |||
---- | |||
* [[Macroscale style machinery at the nanoscale]] | * [[Macroscale style machinery at the nanoscale]] | ||
* [[How macroscale style machinery at the nanoscale outperforms its native scale]] | * [[How macroscale style machinery at the nanoscale outperforms its native scale]] | ||
Latest revision as of 10:01, 22 June 2026
(wiki-TODO: Add historic context.)
The classic ones:
The overlooked ones:
- Jittery finger problem (See also: Thermal motion)
- Sloppy finger problem (zero restoring force cases in protein side-chains, slack, backlash)
- Wobbly finger problem (See also: Stiffness)
Related
- Macroscale style machinery at the nanoscale
- How macroscale style machinery at the nanoscale outperforms its native scale
- Common misconceptions about atomically precise manufacturing (older page)
- Common critique towards diamondoid atomically precise manufacturing and technology