Scanning probe microscopy upwards into 3D: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
| (13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{wikitodo|Add figures from the paper.}} | {{wikitodo|Add figures from the paper.}} | ||
Particular focus on [[stiff cantilever AFM]] here. <br> | |||
Many built up gemstone like product structure may turn out highly insulating/non-conductive thus<br> | |||
ruling out performing conventional [[STM]]. Not rules out aside the product of course. <br> | |||
(If the aside remains still accessible. See: [[Mechanosynthesis mode]]). <br> | |||
== Experimentally demonstrated == | |||
With [[stiff cantilever AFM]] using the CO probing method: | With [[stiff cantilever AFM]] using the CO probing method: | ||
* First using STM (current through the picked up CO) slightly off-site to reproducibly get a reference height | * First using STM (current through the picked up CO) slightly off-site to reproducibly get a reference height | ||
* Then going up and in nc-AFM constant height mode, and scanning the very high up top flat area of <br>small polyadamantanes (nanodiamonds). Note that this is higher up than the length of the probing CO molecule! | * Then going up and in nc-AFM constant height mode, and scanning the very high up top flat area of <br>small polyadamantanes (nanodiamonds). Note that this is higher up than the length of the probing CO molecule! | ||
* There at the top well resolving the diamond (111) face hydrogen termination structure. | * There at the top well resolving the diamond (111) face hydrogen termination structure. | ||
* Avoiding to | * Avoiding to accidentally shift around the extremely weakly to gold bond polyadamantanes | ||
* Avoiding to accidentally pick them up onto the SPM-needle-tip apex | |||
* Avoiding to accidentally toppling over the vertical standing ones (less likely since its more like sticking than lying due to vdW forces vastly exceeding gravity). | |||
* Scanning of hydrogen atoms that were hidden due to lying slightly lower by ramping down the scanning height | * Scanning of hydrogen atoms that were hidden due to lying slightly lower by ramping down the scanning height | ||
== Why may this be relevant and promising? == | == Why may this be relevant and promising? == | ||
[[File:SPM SimulationSoftware Mockup.svg|600px|thumb|right|nc-AFM constant-feedback-mode (~ constant stiffness) would make the big (at this scale blunt looking) SPM-needle-tip apex scratch up the edge of the product. Needed and used instead is constant-height-mode and a non-contact free space motion jump up there. Not shown here is a [[mechanosynthesis adapter molecule]] at the SPM-needle-tip-apex.]] | |||
Why is this a significant advance pointing to the eventual feasibility of <br> | Why is this a significant advance pointing to the eventual feasibility of <br> | ||
| Line 30: | Line 40: | ||
Yes, This experiment was merely very gentle scanning. No strong bonding interactions. <br> | Yes, This experiment was merely very gentle scanning. No strong bonding interactions. <br> | ||
But with structures stronger anchored to the supporting surface <br> | But with structures stronger anchored to the supporting surface <br> | ||
much stronger interactions | much stronger interactions should be possible too. <br> | ||
Potentially enabling [[force applying mechanosyntehsis]] being performed up there up top. | Potentially enabling [[force applying mechanosyntehsis]] being performed up there up top. | ||
The ramping must have been a significant effort judging from the papers mention of (being glad to) not needing to do it again due to the associated slight slant. <br> | The ramping must have been a significant effort judging from the papers mention of (being glad to) not needing to do it again due to the associated slight slant. <br> | ||
There may be a lot to be gained | There may be a lot to be gained by improvement on SPM control software for automating such such rampings and related operations. <br> | ||
Related: [[SPM user interfaces]] | |||
The flat top of these polyadamnatanes was really critical here to get well interpretable images (without | The flat top of these polyadamnatanes was really critical here to get well interpretable images (without computational simulations even). <br> | ||
[[Force applying mechanosyntehsis]] may operate much like a 3D-printer, adding material layer-by-layers, so one always has quite flat top to work with. | [[Force applying mechanosyntehsis]] may operate much like a 3D-printer, adding material layer-by-layers, so one always has quite flat top to work with. <br> | ||
High molecules with nigh perfectly flat top are quite rare thus there are not many experimental examples. <br> | |||
Nanotubes are one case. {{todo|Link relevant nanotube paper & eventually find more examples.}} <br> | |||
== Related pages == | == Related pages == | ||
| Line 51: | Line 63: | ||
★ [Ebling2018] Ebeling, Daniel & Šekutor, Marina & Stiefermann, Marvin & Tschakert, Jalmar & Dahl, Jeremy & Carlson, Robert & Schirmeisen, André & Schreiner, Peter. (2018). Assigning the absolute configuration of single aliphatic molecules by visual inspection. Nature Communications. 9. 10.1038/s41467-018-04843-z. <br> | ★ [Ebling2018] Ebeling, Daniel & Šekutor, Marina & Stiefermann, Marvin & Tschakert, Jalmar & Dahl, Jeremy & Carlson, Robert & Schirmeisen, André & Schreiner, Peter. (2018). Assigning the absolute configuration of single aliphatic molecules by visual inspection. Nature Communications. 9. 10.1038/s41467-018-04843-z. <br> | ||
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-04843-z | https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-04843-z | ||
{{wikitodo|Add some more related qPlus nc-AFM papers: DNA-top-scanning, Nanotube-top-scanning, sp3-alkane-chain-scanning}} | |||
[[Category:Direct path]] | |||
Latest revision as of 20:05, 29 March 2026
(wiki-TODO: Add figures from the paper.)
Particular focus on stiff cantilever AFM here.
Many built up gemstone like product structure may turn out highly insulating/non-conductive thus
ruling out performing conventional STM. Not rules out aside the product of course.
(If the aside remains still accessible. See: Mechanosynthesis mode).
Experimentally demonstrated
With stiff cantilever AFM using the CO probing method:
- First using STM (current through the picked up CO) slightly off-site to reproducibly get a reference height
- Then going up and in nc-AFM constant height mode, and scanning the very high up top flat area of
small polyadamantanes (nanodiamonds). Note that this is higher up than the length of the probing CO molecule! - There at the top well resolving the diamond (111) face hydrogen termination structure.
- Avoiding to accidentally shift around the extremely weakly to gold bond polyadamantanes
- Avoiding to accidentally pick them up onto the SPM-needle-tip apex
- Avoiding to accidentally toppling over the vertical standing ones (less likely since its more like sticking than lying due to vdW forces vastly exceeding gravity).
- Scanning of hydrogen atoms that were hidden due to lying slightly lower by ramping down the scanning height
Why may this be relevant and promising?

Why is this a significant advance pointing to the eventual feasibility of
force applying mechanosynthesis of 3D structures like crystolecules?
Scanning 3D structures so far has been an Achilles heel of scanning probe microscopy (both STM and stiff cantilever AFM).
(wiki-TODO: Link the paper of nc-AFM scanned DNA, showing that images of slightly higher structures without flat top typically become distorted or at least non-interpretable.)
Here it has been shown that one can "jump up" a huge deal and scan up there with no losses in resolution and interpretability.
And without crashing the SPM-needle-tip-apex (big and blunt at this scale) into the high molecules on the surface
As is what the (for this reason not used) constant feedback (~ stiffness) scanning mode would do.
Scratching whit the "blunt" SPM-needle-tips side up the sharp edge of the atomically precise product.
See: SPM user interfaces
Notes
Yes, This experiment was merely very gentle scanning. No strong bonding interactions.
But with structures stronger anchored to the supporting surface
much stronger interactions should be possible too.
Potentially enabling force applying mechanosyntehsis being performed up there up top.
The ramping must have been a significant effort judging from the papers mention of (being glad to) not needing to do it again due to the associated slight slant.
There may be a lot to be gained by improvement on SPM control software for automating such such rampings and related operations.
Related: SPM user interfaces
The flat top of these polyadamnatanes was really critical here to get well interpretable images (without computational simulations even).
Force applying mechanosyntehsis may operate much like a 3D-printer, adding material layer-by-layers, so one always has quite flat top to work with.
High molecules with nigh perfectly flat top are quite rare thus there are not many experimental examples.
Nanotubes are one case. (TODO: Link relevant nanotube paper & eventually find more examples.)
Related pages
- Stiff cantilever AFM & Scanning probe microscopy
- Mechanosynthesis & Mechanosynthesis (disambiguation)
- Why gemstone metamaterial technology should work in brief
- SPM user interfaces
External links
★ [Ebling2018] Ebeling, Daniel & Šekutor, Marina & Stiefermann, Marvin & Tschakert, Jalmar & Dahl, Jeremy & Carlson, Robert & Schirmeisen, André & Schreiner, Peter. (2018). Assigning the absolute configuration of single aliphatic molecules by visual inspection. Nature Communications. 9. 10.1038/s41467-018-04843-z.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-04843-z
(wiki-TODO: Add some more related qPlus nc-AFM papers: DNA-top-scanning, Nanotube-top-scanning, sp3-alkane-chain-scanning)