Surface molecular system: Difference between revisions

From apm
Jump to navigation Jump to search
External links: three more links
added related section
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 114: Line 114:


TODO
TODO
== Related ==
* [[mechanosynthesis mode]]
* [[mechanosynthesis adapter molecule]]


== External links ==
== External links ==
Line 124: Line 129:
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Transition_metal_dichalcogenides Category:Transition_metal_dichalcogenides]
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Transition_metal_dichalcogenides Category:Transition_metal_dichalcogenides]
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MXenes MXenes]
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MXenes MXenes]
* '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphene_nanoribbon Graphene nanoribbons]'''
* '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphene_nanoribbon Graphene nanoribbons]'''
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphene Graphene]
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphene Graphene]
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boron_nitride_nanosheet Boron nitride nanosheet]
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molybdenum_disulfide Molybdenum_disulfide] & [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molybdenum_diselenide Molybdenum diselenide] & [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tungsten_disulfide Tungsten disulfide] & [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tungsten_diselenide Tungsten diselenide]
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Disulfides Category:Disulfides]
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen-bonded_organic_framework Hydrogen-bonded organic framework]
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen-bonded_organic_framework Hydrogen-bonded organic framework]
----
----
Line 148: Line 155:
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polanyi_potential_theory Polanyi potential theory]
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polanyi_potential_theory Polanyi potential theory]
----
----
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monolayer Monolayer] <= '''monolayer formation time'''
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-assembled_monolayer Self-assembled monolayer (SAM)]
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monolayer Monolayer] <= '''UHV monolayer formation time'''
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sticking_coefficient Sticking coefficient]
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle_deposition Particle deposition]
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle_deposition Particle deposition]
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_chemistry Systems chemistry]
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_chemistry Systems chemistry]

Latest revision as of 12:59, 8 January 2026

This article is a stub. It needs to be expanded.

Basically surfaces with molecules atop. These are higly relevant for early mechanosynthesis and force applying mechanosynthesis along the direct path.

Some major of 3D covalent bulk material classes are:

  • Metallic: typically relatively noble metals aka "coinage metals" are used (Au, Ag, Cu, Pt, Ir, …)
    reactive and/or low melting materials are typically avoided
  • Semiconducting: Often III-V or II-VI semiconductors with diamondoid structure (cubic zinkblende structure or hexagonal wurtzite structure)
  • big class of nonmetal gems like e.g. rutile
  • salts or simple cubic oxides

2D covalent layered materials include:

  • single crystalline graphite aka HOPG (highly ordered pyrolytic graphite)
  • sp2 hexagonal boron nitride (isostructural to HOPG)
  • MoS2 and more …

The latter class often can be deposited as monolayer or few layers
on bulk materials fully pr partly covering the bulk below.

Garden of molecules

Due to its easy handling in cleaning and preparation,
quite large fraction of experimental research had been directed towards gold as a bulk base surface.
One particular 2015 paper by Leo gross et.al. (see references) shows
a larger number of at deep cryo temperatures co-deposited molecular species,
that at higher temperatures would be very volatile, diffusing to agglomerates or even desorbing.

Graphene nanoribbons (GNRs)

As time of writing (early 2026) there has been significant progress in
synthesis and subatomic resolution imaging of flat nanographene covalent bonding structures
in particular including graphene nanoribbons with partial positional atomic precision. Pure and doped.

The key technology making this possible on the imaging side was:
Stiff cantilever AFM with pickup of a CO molecule for imaging.
Scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) images electronic state orbitals that are typically larger and
rarely match the mechanical bonding structure in detail.

Synthesis falls apart into …
– conventional chemistry pre-synthesis and
– on surface synthesis with some aspects of 2D self assembly (self folding and self finding).

Barely any work on less flat structures on surfaces - thus big focus on GNRs

Stiff cantilever AFM has exceptionally high height sensitivity.
This is a double edged sword. It is usually performed in constant height mode.
That mode rather than a variable height for keeping a constant feedback value (roughly corresponding to surface stiffness)
While the ihgh sensitivity – makes for an awesomely high contrast it also
– makes for an extremely limited range of imageable depth in constant height mode and
… presumably (judging from absense in papers) for a quite unstable constant stiffness mode.

A crude analogy to the optical microscopy would be a very narrow depth of field.
But here it is not things getting blurry but instead:
– too far away and nothing shows up at
– too close and the tip structure gets damaged (more or less reversibly)

Stiff cantilever AFM key (non) achievements in going 3D:

  • Imaging sp2 alkane tydrocarbon chains has been achived (smapped between pieces of graphene. (wiki-TODO: add reference to relevant paper)
  • Imaging DNA did not yield good structure depicting results. Presumably due to height and absence of flat to surface. (wiki-TODO: add reference to relevant paper)
  • Imaging of nanotubes has been demonstrated but the results are likely deceptive.
    Deceptive due to excessive height magnification of the nanotubes uppermost portion that is te only scanned/scannable part. (wiki-TODO: add reference to relevant paper)
  • Imaging of polyadamantanes had been achieved. They are high but feature a nigh perfectly flat top. A feature rarely (ever?) found in any other systems. (wiki-TODO: add reference to relevant paper)
  • Imaging of spiroligomers has not yet been attempted with this kind of technology (to the knowledge of the author as of early 2026).

Experimental imaging of polyadamantanes on gold:
⚠️ Imaging of high up polyadamantanes (i.e. nanodiamond) surfaces
may serve as one of the strongest indications that
mechnosynthesis high up in 3D might eventually actually work
even with macrsoscale scanning probe microscopy systems.

Possible improvement: Reduction of scanning depth limitations:
There may be ways to allow for scanning more than the uppermost tip of larger 3D structures using stiff cantilever AFM.
It may be to a large part just a matter of improvement on scanning software.

GNR synthesis: On-surface-cyclodehydrogenation (and dehalogenatio)

– Liquid phase pre syntehsis of aromatic ring rich hydrogacbon chains. Then purification.
– Deposition onto typically gold samples
– Controlled hearing profile for the rings to desorb as H2 molecules hydrogens and join up to larger nanographitic structures.
– Sometimes halogens are included that desorb earlier (as Cl2 Br2 I2) to some degree controlledly. Giving more options.

GNRs under termination control i.e. graphene 2D crystolecules

Most graphene nanoribbons are only internally positionallly atomic precise.
Since they have no termination condition in the lengthwise direction they overall
can't be considered positionally atomic precise. They are statistic in their length distribution.

There have been attempts go get fully atomically precise structures.
– either by just making small flakes instead of non-terminating nanoribbons
– or by step-by-step iterative pre-sysntehsis (wiki-TODO: Add reference to relevant pager examples.)
The latter may still have small finite number of possible outcomes due to binary rotation options (ignoring damage error states here).
If the desired ones can picked out in post processing then this can be considered atomically precise.

There have been attempts on …
– dragging small (more or less atomically precise) graphene flakes controlledly around
– fusing small flakes edge-to-egde by halogen split-off
– tip-based local on surface cyclodehydrogenation (away from the gold surface indicating abence of dependence on caralysis)
(wiki-TODO: Add reference to relevant pager examples for these.)

Salt islands on coinage metals

– very flat thus well scannable
– entrappment of single electrons in nanograpehne structures atop
– polyyne structures are being exploded, eve very long structures quite stable
… (reminds a bit on the polyyne bases minimal size rod-logic that was proposed in Nanosystem)

Other 2D materials atop a different bulk

Silicene

– usually synthesized on silver (Ag) rather than gold (wiki-TODO: fin out why)

Grahitic hexagonal boron nitride (few layers)

TODO

Related

External links

Wikipedia




Papers

Gross, Leo & Schuler, Bruno & Mohn, Fabian & Moll, Nikolaj & Repp, Jascha & Meyer, Gerhard. (2015). Atomic Resolution on Molecules with Functionalized Tips. NanoScience and Technology. 97. 223-246. 10.1007/978-3-319-15588-3_12.

Paper on springer
Paper on reseachgate
Fig12 on researchgate