Isotropy of materials: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Created page with "{{stub}} Diamondoid compounds have at best cubic symmetry better almost spherical isotropy (direction independence of mechanical and other properties) needs to be emulated..." |
m just minor changes, change to less preoccupied statements |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
[[ | [[Gemstone like compound]]s have at "best" cubic symmetry better almost spherical isotropy <br> | ||
Many [[ | (direction independence of mechanical and other properties) needs to be emulated by [[gemstone based metamaterial]]s. <br> | ||
Many [[gemstone like compound]]s like e.g. trigonal α-[[silicon nitride|silicon-nitride]] (nierite) have low symmetry. <br> | |||
This may make designing with them harder. Automation of design can help. | |||
Latest revision as of 12:39, 21 September 2025
Gemstone like compounds have at "best" cubic symmetry better almost spherical isotropy
(direction independence of mechanical and other properties) needs to be emulated by gemstone based metamaterials.
Many gemstone like compounds like e.g. trigonal α-silicon-nitride (nierite) have low symmetry.
This may make designing with them harder. Automation of design can help.