Self limitation for safety: Difference between revisions

From apm
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
mNo edit summary
m →Related: added back-link to page Grey goo horror fable
 
(13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Template:Stub}}
{{Template:Stub}}
[[File:Ugility fog chair attacks by MCKIBILLO.png|300px|thumb|right|If objects are made form specialized [[gem-gum|gemstone based metamaterials]] rather than fully general purpose [[utility fog]] then they fundamentally can't be hacked to do direct malicious surprise attacks. Just a self suggesting example here.]]


* usage of specialised and in function limited [[diamondoid metamaterial|metamaterials]] instead of general purpouse [[utility fog]] (e.g. shelving systems)
* [[Mobility prevention guideline]]
* Combination lock stones as a safety measure against malicious disassebly attacks are metioned [[Grey goo meme|here]].
* integrated oszillators as physical timer to artificially slow down the disassembly of microcomponents - this allows for more response time.


Against [[software hacking]]:
* Usage of specialised and in function limited [[diamondoid metamaterial|metamaterials]] instead of general purpouse [[utility fog]] (e.g. shelving systems).
Against [[direct physical hacking attacks]]:
* Combination [[Keysholes for microcomponent disassembly|lock stones]] as a safety measure against malicious disassebly attacks are metioned [[Grey goo meme|here]].
* Integrated oszillators as physical timer to artificially slow down the disassembly of microcomponents - this allows for more response time.
Other:
* Wikipedia: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fail-safe Fail safe]
* Battling Murphy's law ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murphy%27s_law wikipedia])
== Related ==
* [[Safety]]
* [[Safety towards and with gem based APM]]
* [[Informal laws]]
* [[Keysholes for microcomponent disassembly]]
* [[Grey goo horror fable]]
----
Another case of self limiting but here not for safety but for performance:
* [[Consistent design for external limiting factors]]


* Wikipedia: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fail-safe Fail safe]
[[Category:Information]]
[[Category:General]]

Latest revision as of 19:33, 2 January 2025

This article is a stub. It needs to be expanded.
If objects are made form specialized gemstone based metamaterials rather than fully general purpose utility fog then they fundamentally can't be hacked to do direct malicious surprise attacks. Just a self suggesting example here.

Against software hacking:

  • Usage of specialised and in function limited metamaterials instead of general purpouse utility fog (e.g. shelving systems).

Against direct physical hacking attacks:

  • Combination lock stones as a safety measure against malicious disassebly attacks are metioned here.
  • Integrated oszillators as physical timer to artificially slow down the disassembly of microcomponents - this allows for more response time.

Other:

Related

Another case of self limiting but here not for safety but for performance:

Retrieved from "https://apm.bplaced.net/w/index.php?title=Self_limitation_for_safety&oldid=17205"