Same absolute speeds for smaller machinery - Revision history

Apm: /* Related */

2026-09-29T07:42:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:42, 29 September 2026
Line 84:		Line 84:

	* [[Scale natural frequency]] (Twice the frequency of half sized machinery)		* [[Scale natural frequency]] (Twice the frequency of half sized machinery)
			* Complement page: [[Same frequencies for smaller machinery]] (not scale natural)
	----		----
	* [[Scaling law]]		* [[Scaling law]]

Apm: /* Related */

2026-09-29T07:40:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:40, 29 September 2026
Line 83:		Line 83:
	== Related ==		== Related ==

	* [[Scale natural frequency]]		* [[Scale natural frequency]] (Twice the frequency of half sized machinery)
	----		----
	* [[Scaling law]]		* [[Scaling law]]

Apm: /* Impractical extreme ends and the golden middle as a start for optimizations */ reordered, put the "golden middle" in the middle

2026-09-29T07:13:09Z

Impractical extreme ends and the golden middle as a start for optimizations: reordered, put the "golden middle" in the middle

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:13, 29 September 2026
Line 77:		Line 77:
	\|-		\|-
	\| [[File:NanosystemsNotAProposedDesignConvergentAssembly.jpg\|200px\|thumb\|center\|'''NOT A PROPOSED SYSTEM''' – The other extreme end. '''[[Same frequencies for smaller machinery]]''' leading to '''linearly falling absolute speeds for smaller machinery.'''}}]]		\| [[File:NanosystemsNotAProposedDesignConvergentAssembly.jpg\|200px\|thumb\|center\|'''NOT A PROPOSED SYSTEM''' – The other extreme end. '''[[Same frequencies for smaller machinery]]''' leading to '''linearly falling absolute speeds for smaller machinery.'''}}]]
	\| [[File:ConvergentAssemblyThroughputScalingLaw-compressed.jpg\|200px\|thumb\|center\|'''NOT A PROPOSED SYSTEM''' – The other extreme end of '''same absolute speeds for smaller machinery''' leading to '''linearly rising frequencies form smaller machiners''' this is better more natural starting point but still just a bad starting point very far away from even crudely optimized systems.]]
	\| [[File:productive-nanosystems-video-snapshot.png\|thumb\|center\|200px\|'''THIS(!) IS A PROPOSED SYSTEM''' – Real systems will be an intermediate between the two leaning to the latter as baseline but skewing a bit over to the former for the bottom-most layer. Motivations being: (A) Reducing speeds to reduce friction. See: [[Increasing bearing area to decrease friction]] and (B) Specialized part assembly line machanosynthesis to get a nicely high spacial density of operating reaction sites.]]		\| [[File:productive-nanosystems-video-snapshot.png\|thumb\|center\|200px\|'''THIS(!) IS A PROPOSED SYSTEM''' – Real systems will be an intermediate between the two leaning to the latter as baseline but skewing a bit over to the former for the bottom-most layer. Motivations being: (A) Reducing speeds to reduce friction. See: [[Increasing bearing area to decrease friction]] and (B) Specialized part assembly line machanosynthesis to get a nicely high spacial density of operating reaction sites.]]
			\| [[File:ConvergentAssemblyThroughputScalingLaw-compressed.jpg\|200px\|thumb\|center\|'''NOT A PROPOSED SYSTEM''' – The other extreme end of '''same absolute speeds for smaller machinery''' leading to '''linearly rising frequencies form smaller machiners''' this is better more natural starting point that rising frequencies but still just a bad starting point very far away from even crudely optimized systems.]]
	\|}		\|}

Apm: new section == Impractical extreme ends and the golden middle as a start for optimizations ==

2026-09-29T07:10:09Z

new section == Impractical extreme ends and the golden middle as a start for optimizations ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:10, 29 September 2026
Line 71:		Line 71:

	Related: [[Intuitive feel]]		Related: [[Intuitive feel]]

			== Impractical extreme ends and the golden middle as a start for optimizations ==

			{\| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:100%;"
			\|-
			\| [[File:NanosystemsNotAProposedDesignConvergentAssembly.jpg\|200px\|thumb\|center\|'''NOT A PROPOSED SYSTEM''' – The other extreme end. '''[[Same frequencies for smaller machinery]]''' leading to '''linearly falling absolute speeds for smaller machinery.'''}}]]
			\| [[File:ConvergentAssemblyThroughputScalingLaw-compressed.jpg\|200px\|thumb\|center\|'''NOT A PROPOSED SYSTEM''' – The other extreme end of '''same absolute speeds for smaller machinery''' leading to '''linearly rising frequencies form smaller machiners''' this is better more natural starting point but still just a bad starting point very far away from even crudely optimized systems.]]
			\| [[File:productive-nanosystems-video-snapshot.png\|thumb\|center\|200px\|'''THIS(!) IS A PROPOSED SYSTEM''' – Real systems will be an intermediate between the two leaning to the latter as baseline but skewing a bit over to the former for the bottom-most layer. Motivations being: (A) Reducing speeds to reduce friction. See: [[Increasing bearing area to decrease friction]] and (B) Specialized part assembly line machanosynthesis to get a nicely high spacial density of operating reaction sites.]]
			\|}

	== Related ==		== Related ==

Apm: Category:Surprising facts

2026-03-29T20:44:18Z

Category:Surprising facts

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:44, 29 March 2026
Line 82:		Line 82:

	[[Category:Scaling law]]		[[Category:Scaling law]]
			[[Category:Surprising facts]]

Apm: added illustrative graphic, same as on page Higher throughput of smaller machinery

2024-09-15T10:27:08Z

added illustrative graphic, same as on page Higher throughput of smaller machinery

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:27, 15 September 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
			[[File:ConvergentAssemblyThroughputScalingLaw-compressed.jpg\|400px\|thumb\|right\|In this screencap of an animation the base assumption is "[[same absolute speeds for smaller machinery]]" (leading to linearly higher frequency of smaller machinery) this is only good as a first crude approximation. In an actual system one will want to slow down at the smallest scales, thus this geometry does not correspond to an actually proposed system, at least not at the smallest scales. More infos to this grapic on the page: [[Higher throughput of smaller machinery]].]]

	'''Constancy as the natural scaling option for speed of operations of machinery'''		'''Constancy as the natural scaling option for speed of operations of machinery'''

Apm: /* Related */

2024-03-01T12:55:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:55, 1 March 2024
Line 76:		Line 76:
	* [[Scaling law]]		* [[Scaling law]]
	----		----
	* [[Same relative deflections across scales]]		* '''[[Same relative deflections across scales]]'''
	* '''[[Higher throughput of smaller machinery]]'''		* '''[[Higher throughput of smaller machinery]]'''

	[[Category:Scaling law]]		[[Category:Scaling law]]

Apm: /* Related */

2024-03-01T12:55:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:55, 1 March 2024
Line 77:		Line 77:
	----		----
	* [[Same relative deflections across scales]]		* [[Same relative deflections across scales]]
	* [[Higher throughput of smaller machinery]]		* '''[[Higher throughput of smaller machinery]]'''

	[[Category:Scaling law]]		[[Category:Scaling law]]

Apm at 14:52, 29 February 2024

2024-02-29T14:52:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:52, 29 February 2024
Line 2:		Line 2:

	What are the motivating factors to keep speed of machinery motions constant across scales (as a first approximation)?		What are the motivating factors to keep speed of machinery motions constant across scales (as a first approximation)?
	* Keeping relative scale deflections from machine motions constant across scales		* Keeping relative scale deflections from machine motions constant across scales (see: [[Same relative deflections across scales]])
	* Keeping friction losses constant across scales		* Keeping friction losses constant across scales
	As it turns out both imply constant speeds across scales. <br>		As it turns out both imply constant speeds across scales. <br>

Apm: /* Related */

2022-10-05T15:35:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:35, 5 October 2022
Line 73:		Line 73:

	* [[Scale natural frequency]]		* [[Scale natural frequency]]
			----
	* [[Scaling law]]		* [[Scaling law]]
			----
	* [[Same relative deflections across scales]]		* [[Same relative deflections across scales]]
	* [[Higher throughput of smaller machinery]]		* [[Higher throughput of smaller machinery]]

	[[Category:Scaling law]]		[[Category:Scaling law]]