<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://apm.bplaced.net/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=RepRec_aspect_ratio</id>
	<title>RepRec aspect ratio - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://apm.bplaced.net/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=RepRec_aspect_ratio"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://apm.bplaced.net/w/index.php?title=RepRec_aspect_ratio&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-10-23T02:02:31Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://apm.bplaced.net/w/index.php?title=RepRec_aspect_ratio&amp;diff=20986&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Apm: bsic page (migrated over from desktop wili)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://apm.bplaced.net/w/index.php?title=RepRec_aspect_ratio&amp;diff=20986&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-09-05T11:42:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;bsic page (migrated over from desktop wili)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{RepRec}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Aspect ratio near 1:1:1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as the size range of parts shall be kept in a narrow range for [[RepRec]] systems,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(See: [[RepRec narrow part size range convention]]) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
so shall the aspect ratio be kept reasonably near to 1:1:1 too. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Motivation being limiting the need for robotic assembly robotics to one single size.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
★ Nanoscale a second size above mechanosynthesis and later eventually bigger sized assembly stages too. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
★ Macroscale a single size assuming part pre-production as cheap enough [[RepRec vitamins]] and larger scales remaining industrial. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
This self imposed design constraint means: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
★ &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Avoid very long thin struts&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
★ &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Avoid big thin plates&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
★ and everything in-between &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One could say that with parts with extreme aspect ratios &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
one necessarily violates the narrow size range convention too. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Either at the lower or the upper end of the part size scale. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course pre-assembly of all sorts of chains &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(especially [[ReChain strut]]s and [[rigid chain]]s) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
with [[RepRec factorylets]] will eventually make the handling &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
of parts with a bit larger aspect ratios unavoidably necessary. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Robotic Linkage Struts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[RepRec systems]] need robotic stages as mechanisms &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
and these often/typically contain long high aspect ration linkage mechanism struts. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
These mechanism struts could be made quickly changeable in length by using some [[ReChain frame system]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
That is, beyond just using [[ReChain]] for the the static frame/truss/matrix ([[RepRec outer framework]]), &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
using it for mobile parts in [[RepRec]]s too. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The issues from these struts (being made from many low aspect ratio blocks) include:&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
★ significant size overhead to monolithic struts (issue for nanoscale)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
★ significant mass overhead to monolithic struts (issue for macroscale)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
★ reduced load carrying capacity (maybe) due to pre-tensioning if that is used ([[ReChain]]). &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These issues are more critical for the moving parts than for the surrounding frame. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the struts become too long then they will start to need scaffolding. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Like seen in cranes, bridges, and High voltage masts (just smaller). &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For [[FFF]] 3D printed structures such scaffolded structures would be large in size (for DIY scales at least)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Too large for robotic linkages (DIY scale) and thus better only used just for the [[RepRec outer framework]].&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikitodo|Add relevant sketch.}} &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Proteins based struts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In protein engineering there is a characterization length parameter (the [[persistence length]]) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
that informs about at which length self-assembled rods can no longer keep themselves straight. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
That is: Deviate from being strait as crossing a certain threshold average angle in bending. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A topic more on the [[ReChain frame systems]] side. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[RepRec narrow part size range convention]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[ReChain frame systems]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Original page created 2021-11-18 Thursday, migrated to public wiki 2026-09-05&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Apm</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>