Religion of the quantum random fate extenders - Revision history

Apm: /* Related */ Hyper isolation chamber

2023-12-04T09:05:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:05, 4 December 2023
Line 67:		Line 67:
	== Related ==		== Related ==

	* [[Inverse quantum isolation chamber]]		* [[Inverse quantum isolation chamber]] & [[Hyper isolation chamber]]
	* [[The fractal braided river of fate]]		* [[The fractal braided river of fate]]
	----		----

Apm: /* Related / The fractal braided river of fate

2023-10-15T17:53:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:53, 15 October 2023
Line 68:		Line 68:

	* [[Inverse quantum isolation chamber]]		* [[Inverse quantum isolation chamber]]
			* [[The fractal braided river of fate]]
	----		----
	* [[Determinism of AI]]		* [[Determinism of AI]]
	* [[Philosophical topics]]		* [[Philosophical topics]]
	* [[Big bang as spontaneous demixing event]]		* [[Big bang as spontaneous demixing event]]

Apm: /* Controversial/questionable additionals / Strive to build an use an inverse quantum isolation chamber

2023-10-15T17:51:42Z

Controversial/questionable additionals: * Strive to build an use an inverse quantum isolation chamber

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:51, 15 October 2023
Line 56:		Line 56:
	* That in the end practicality rules every time.		* That in the end practicality rules every time.
	* That constructivistic/intuitionistic math is sufficient for practical purposes.		* That constructivistic/intuitionistic math is sufficient for practical purposes.
	* That real numbers have no practical value? Considering pi,e,… being part of the set of all systematically and countably listable algorithms (within the program of all programs) so they are not lost. Any approximation of pi is a rational. And any generation algorithm (of an equivalence class) is not transfinite. Things that can't be constructed don't exist outside a mind game.		* That real numbers have no practical value? Considering pi,e,… being part of the set of all systematically and countably listable algorithms (within the program of all programs) so they are not lost. Any approximation of pi is a rational. And any generation algorithm (of an equivalence class) is not transfinite. Things that can't be constructed don't exist outside a mind game.
			* Strive to build an use an [[inverse quantum isolation chamber]]

	== Symbol ==		== Symbol ==

Apm: /* Related */

2023-10-15T17:49:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:49, 15 October 2023
Line 67:		Line 67:

	* [[Inverse quantum isolation chamber]]		* [[Inverse quantum isolation chamber]]
	~~––––~~		----
	* [[Determinism of AI]]		* [[Determinism of AI]]
	* [[Philosophical topics]]		* [[Philosophical topics]]
	* [[Big bang as spontaneous demixing event]]		* [[Big bang as spontaneous demixing event]]

Apm: /* Related / Inverse quantum isolation chamber

2023-10-15T17:49:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:49, 15 October 2023
Line 66:		Line 66:
	== Related ==		== Related ==

			* [[Inverse quantum isolation chamber]]
			––––
	* [[Determinism of AI]]		* [[Determinism of AI]]
	* [[Philosophical topics]]		* [[Philosophical topics]]
	* [[Big bang as spontaneous demixing event]]		* [[Big bang as spontaneous demixing event]]

Apm at 12:52, 27 August 2023

2023-08-27T12:52:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:52, 27 August 2023
Line 57:		Line 57:
	* That constructivistic/intuitionistic math is sufficient for practical purposes.		* That constructivistic/intuitionistic math is sufficient for practical purposes.
	* That real numbers have no practical value? Considering pi,e,… being part of the set of all systematically and countably listable algorithms (within the program of all programs) so they are not lost. Any approximation of pi is a rational. And any generation algorithm (of an equivalence class) is not transfinite. Things that can't be constructed don't exist outside a mind game.		* That real numbers have no practical value? Considering pi,e,… being part of the set of all systematically and countably listable algorithms (within the program of all programs) so they are not lost. Any approximation of pi is a rational. And any generation algorithm (of an equivalence class) is not transfinite. Things that can't be constructed don't exist outside a mind game.

			== Symbol ==

			Well, a religion needs it symbol. Not? <br>
			How about an upper outline of a fat cat from the front with a bohr atom and a heart inside. <br>
			{{wikitodo\|make a logo}}

	== Related ==		== Related ==

Apm: /* Techno-polictacal stances */

2023-08-27T12:46:08Z

Techno-polictacal stances

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:46, 27 August 2023
Line 24:		Line 24:
	* Weirdly: Rebirth but not necessarily reincarnation. That is not nessecarily on associatability.		* Weirdly: Rebirth but not necessarily reincarnation. That is not nessecarily on associatability.

	== Techno-~~polictacal~~ stances ==		== Techno-polictical stances ==

	* Are not find of [[determinism of AI]]. They see it as highly effective diversity killer within the multiverse.		* Are not find of [[determinism of AI]]. They see it as highly effective diversity killer within the multiverse.

Apm at 12:45, 27 August 2023

2023-08-27T12:45:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:45, 27 August 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{~~spaculative~~}}		{{speculative}}

	This page is obviously more meant as a joke. <br>		This page is obviously more meant as a joke. <br>

Apm: basic page

2023-08-27T12:45:13Z

basic page

New page

{{spaculative}}

This page is obviously more meant as a joke. 
But if someone really wan'ts to adopt this then so be it.

== Practice ==

* Always carry around a quantum random generator. Or at least have an app installed for pulling some TRNGs like random.org.
* In case of necessary decisions that clearly have no better options use the generator to decide.
* Never ditch a obviously better option for using the generator.
* Never avoid the generator when there is actually no better option.
* The more irrevesible and life changing the decision the more important to consider using the generator. Considerning using it does not necessarily mean actually using it.
* Act according to the derived ethics

== Core belief: Fate is enrichable in the very grandest scheme of things ==
* That by their practicing of the religion their "soul" (in the sense of almost identical life histories within the multiverse) will not be trapped for eternity of all recurrences beyond eternity of a single recurrence.

== The technicalities ==

* Poincaret recurrence on an universal scale. That is: The [[big bang as spontaneous demixing event]] or something preceding acting equivalently.
* The multiverse (Everett interpretation of quantum mechanics on universal scales)
* Continuity on temporal perception.
* Equivalently: Even after death any amount of (space)time is shrunk to zero due to the sampling frequency dropping to zero.
* Weirdly: Rebirth but not necessarily reincarnation. That is not nessecarily on associatability.

== Techno-polictacal stances ==

* Are not find of [[determinism of AI]]. They see it as highly effective diversity killer within the multiverse.
* Want AI to use TRNGs and seeds that are the same size as the outputs. Or at least as big as feasibly possible.

== The Ethics ==

* '''Working for the good does matter''' and is like a democratic ballot within the multiverse
* '''Working against the bad does matter''' equally.
* Life is the most significant thing in the universe as scale does not matter when it comes to lifeless expanses.
* Drawing the fine line between good and bad is and always will remain an eternal struggle.
* Just one thing is clear: That life is the ultimate good and death is the ultimate bad.
* Trying is better than not since not trying means certain failure.
* All things are eventually manageable in the great scheme of the multiverse. Many small steps can lead to unfatomable results.

== The great mysteries ==

* That the most likely experienced universes withing the multiverse are the ones that …
* … are sufficient for self-aware and emotion-feeling life
* … are most data-compressable
* … are most numerous
* That we might never know what kind of wildly different universes may be out there that fulfill these necessary criteria.

== Optional additionals ==
* That it is ok to not have an opinion to everything.
* That there might be things that fundamentally can never be proven or disproven. Like "the ultimate cause" for everything.

== Controversial/questionable additionals ==

* That physics might be just as boundless as math is. Math with its incompletness and/or inconsistency not being provable from withing by now being proven.
* That in the end practicality rules every time.
* That constructivistic/intuitionistic math is sufficient for practical purposes.
* That real numbers have no practical value? Considering pi,e,… being part of the set of all systematically and countably listable algorithms (within the program of all programs) so they are not lost. Any approximation of pi is a rational. And any generation algorithm (of an equivalence class) is not transfinite. Things that can't be constructed don't exist outside a mind game.

== Related ==

* [[Determinism of AI]]
* [[Philosophical topics]]
* [[Big bang as spontaneous demixing event]]