Quantum dispersed crystolecules - Revision history

Apm: /* Related */

2021-06-29T13:50:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:50, 29 June 2021
Line 104:		Line 104:
	* [[The problems with Star Treck like beaming]]		* [[The problems with Star Treck like beaming]]
	* [[Quantum computation]]		* [[Quantum computation]]
	* ''[[Quantum mechanics]]''		* '''[[Quantum mechanics]]'''
	* [[Particle acceleration of crystolecules]]		* [[Particle acceleration of crystolecules]]

Apm: /* Related / added link to yet unwritten page Particle acceleration of crystolecules

2021-06-29T13:50:23Z

Related: added link to yet unwritten page * Particle acceleration of crystolecules

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:50, 29 June 2021
Line 104:		Line 104:
	* [[The problems with Star Treck like beaming]]		* [[The problems with Star Treck like beaming]]
	* [[Quantum computation]]		* [[Quantum computation]]
	* [[Quantum mechanics]]		* ''[[Quantum mechanics]]''
			* [[Particle acceleration of crystolecules]]

Apm: /* Hypotetical application: Instant transport ("one way physical nanoscale beaming") */ minus two newlines

2021-06-29T13:48:32Z

Hypotetical application: Instant transport ("one way physical nanoscale beaming"): minus two newlines

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:48, 29 June 2021
Line 81:		Line 81:
	* one may send them as small (packaged?) atom clusters – a trade-off between decoherence prevention difficulty and storage density?		* one may send them as small (packaged?) atom clusters – a trade-off between decoherence prevention difficulty and storage density?
	* to avoid needing to buy the expensive scarce element it eventually needs to be shipped back by the now only possible conventional transport <br>(possibly splitting it up quantum mechanically again)		* to avoid needing to buy the expensive scarce element it eventually needs to be shipped back by the now only possible conventional transport <br>(possibly splitting it up quantum mechanically again)



	=== What needs to work to make this a reality ===		=== What needs to work to make this a reality ===

Apm: /* Hypotetical application: Instant transport ("one way physical nanoscale beaming") */ more fixing of the usage of the word "entanglement".usage of

2021-06-29T13:46:11Z

Hypotetical application: Instant transport ("one way physical nanoscale beaming"): more fixing of the usage of the word "entanglement".usage of

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:46, 29 June 2021
Line 58:		Line 58:

	This raises the question:		This raises the question:
	* What would be the storage density of '''"quantum ~~entangled~~ [[component]] storage cells"'''?		* What would be the storage density of '''"quantum disperdsed [[component]] storage cells"'''?
	* How many different kinds of [[components]] can be stored in a single levitation chamber?		* How many different kinds of [[components]] can be stored in a single levitation chamber?
	* If multiple components in one chamber: How to prevent them from aggregating together in their quantum mechanical frame of reference.		* If multiple components in one chamber: How to prevent them from aggregating together in their quantum mechanical frame of reference.

	'''Interesting thought:''' <br>		'''Interesting thought:''' <br>
	From the quantum mechanical frame of reference of the levitated components all of reality around them becomes ~~entangled~~. <br>		From the quantum mechanical frame of reference of the levitated components all of reality around them becomes quantum-dispersed. <br>
	They se themselves transported to two different places at the same time in an whole reality ~~entanglig~~ way. <br>		They "see" themselves transported to two different places at the same time in an whole external reality splitting way. <br>
	This becomes pretty wild if the ~~entagleable~~ components become big enough to be able to implement simple comutational capabilities		This becomes pretty wild if the qunatum-dispersable components become big enough to be able to implement simple comutational capabilities

			It should ''not'' be possible to exceed the volume storage capacity of a levitation chamber. <br>
			When we already that a (delibearately) wave-collapsed-component say component "A" was so big that it filled most of the whole levitation chamber <br>
			then we know that no other component "B" of similar size can have been in there because <br>
			the parts would have needed to sterically massively overlap, which is just not possible. <br>
			Entanglement it seems.

	~~It should not be possible to exceed the volume storage capacity of a levitation chamber. <br>~~
	~~When we already that a (delibearately) wave-collapsed-component A was so big that it filled most of the whole levitation chamber <br>~~
	~~then we know that no other part of similar size can have been in there because <br>~~
	~~the parts would have needed to sterically massively overlap, which is just not possible.~~

	=== Scarce elements ===		=== Scarce elements ===

Apm: /* Self suggesting (thought?) experiments */ removed likely faulty use of the word "entangled" – its just quantum dispersion of one particle here

2021-06-29T13:38:28Z

Self suggesting (thought?) experiments: removed likely faulty use of the word "entangled" – its just quantum dispersion of one particle here

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:38, 29 June 2021
Line 28:		Line 28:
	* Split up the wave function in exactly two (dichotomic) parts by making the central position energetically undesirable (repulsive potential)		* Split up the wave function in exactly two (dichotomic) parts by making the central position energetically undesirable (repulsive potential)
	* (Leave splitting into more than two parts for advanced experiments)		* (Leave splitting into more than two parts for advanced experiments)
	* Widen the ~~seperating~~ "energetic wall" to push the now split up parts of the wave function sufficiently far apart to the outer ends of the chamber		* Widen the separating "energetic wall" to push the now split up parts of the wave function sufficiently far apart to the outer ends of the chamber
	* At the now well cleared out central spot separate the long levitation chamber into two individual levitation chambers that can be transported separately. (Physical walls optional?)		* At the now well cleared out central spot separate the long levitation chamber into two individual levitation chambers that can be transported separately. (Physical walls optional?)
	* Take many of such prepared ~~entangled~~ levitation chambers and transport them to two far away places.		* Take many of such prepared halve-of-wave-function-carrying levitation chambers and transport them to two far away places.
	* Try to get significantly more than 50% of the wave function to collapse at only one of these places.		* Try to get significantly more than 50% of the wave function to collapse at only one of these places.

Line 39:		Line 39:
	* When collapsing the wave function deliberately in a naive way (like squeezing to check if something is in there), <br>will this lead to on average 50% of the components end up on either side? Like in experiments with light polarization?		* When collapsing the wave function deliberately in a naive way (like squeezing to check if something is in there), <br>will this lead to on average 50% of the components end up on either side? Like in experiments with light polarization?
	* Are there strategies (maybe taken from quantum computing) that can be employed to influence that ratio only after the separating transport?		* Are there strategies (maybe taken from quantum computing) that can be employed to influence that ratio only after the separating transport?
	* What if a shape matching [[Van der Waals binding site]] is presented in only one of the two (now far apart) ~~entangled~~ chambers? <br>A binding site that makes a wave collapse on that side energetically much more favorable. This makes it seem more plausible.		* What if a shape matching [[Van der Waals binding site]] is presented in only one of the two (now far apart) half-of-wave-function-carrying chambers? <br>A binding site that makes a wave collapse on that side energetically much more favorable. This makes it seem more plausible.

	=== Hypotetical application: Instant transport ("one way physical nanoscale beaming") ===		=== Hypotetical application: Instant transport ("one way physical nanoscale beaming") ===

Apm: /* Related / added Quantum computation * Quantum mechanics

2021-06-25T09:02:57Z

Related: added * Quantum computation * Quantum mechanics

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:02, 25 June 2021
Line 104:		Line 104:
	* [[Levitation]]		* [[Levitation]]
	* [[The problems with Star Treck like beaming]]		* [[The problems with Star Treck like beaming]]
			* [[Quantum computation]]
			* [[Quantum mechanics]]

Apm: massive extension – lots of cool speculative stuff

2021-06-25T08:58:51Z

massive extension – lots of cool speculative stuff

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 Good question. <br>
-Curiosity, research, ..., Exploiting some special effects that are yet to discover?
+Curiosity, research, ..., <br>
 == Related ==
 * [[Machine phase]]
-* [[trapped free particles]]
+* [[Trapped free particles]]
 * [[Levitation]]

Apm: basic page

2021-06-25T06:06:03Z

basic page

New page

{{stub}}

The idea here is to reduce the constraint on position and orentation of nanoscale to microscale [[components]] ([[crystolecule]]s, ...) 
by [[levitation|levitating]] them weakly constrained. 
Thereby they become [[trapped free particles]] and may start to nanomechanically quantum disperse. 
Then the situation that "[[nanomechanics is barely mechanical quantummechanics]]" no longer holds.

== Motivation ==

'''Why would one want to do this?''' 
A main goal in [[atomically precise manufacturing]] is to gain and retain 
control over position and orientation of atoms and molecules. Not to deliberately let go of it. 
See: [[The defining traits of gem-gum-tec]]

Good question. 
Curiosity, research, ..., Exploiting some special effects that are yet to discover?

== Related ==

* [[Machine phase]]
* [[trapped free particles]]
* [[Levitation]]