Persistence length - Revision history

Apm: /* Related */

2024-11-19T12:08:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:08, 19 November 2024
Line 23:		Line 23:
	== Related ==		== Related ==

	* [[Self-assemby]] & [[System complexity scaling of self-assembly]]		* [[Self-assemby]] & [[System complexity scaling with self-assembly]]
	* 3D [[structural DNA nanotechnology]]		* 3D [[structural DNA nanotechnology]]
	* [[Tether assisted assembly]]		* [[Tether assisted assembly]]

Apm: /* Related */

2024-11-18T19:26:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:26, 18 November 2024
Line 29:		Line 29:
	* [[Foldamer technology stiffness nesting]] & [[Stiffness focusing]]		* [[Foldamer technology stiffness nesting]] & [[Stiffness focusing]]
	----		----
	* [[Circumsembly]]		* [[Circumsembly]] - Multiple parallel paths can make for stiffer structures => longer persistence length (depending on structural fill density)

	== External links ==		== External links ==

	* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persistence_length		* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persistence_length

Apm: /* Related / added link to page Circumsembly

2024-11-18T19:24:14Z

Related: added link to page * Circumsembly

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:24, 18 November 2024
Line 28:		Line 28:
	* [[Foldamer printer]] & [[Robo approach]]		* [[Foldamer printer]] & [[Robo approach]]
	* [[Foldamer technology stiffness nesting]] & [[Stiffness focusing]]		* [[Foldamer technology stiffness nesting]] & [[Stiffness focusing]]
			----
			* [[Circumsembly]]

	== External links ==		== External links ==

	* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persistence_length		* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persistence_length

Apm at 11:55, 16 November 2024

2024-11-16T11:55:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:55, 16 November 2024
Line 16:		Line 16:
	feature some minimum amount of stiffness. <br>		feature some minimum amount of stiffness. <br>

	Also very ~~bulky structures~~ can be made to barely flex at all <br>		Also even very low stiffness technologies can be made to barely flex at all
	finer details then ~~integrated form siffer~~ technologies: <br>		by resorting to sticking to very bulky structures only. <br>
			And adding in finer details finer details then using stiffer technologies exclusively: <br>
	See: [[Foldamer technology stiffness nesting]] ( & [[Stiffness focusing]]) <br>		See: [[Foldamer technology stiffness nesting]] ( & [[Stiffness focusing]]) <br>

Apm at 11:53, 16 November 2024

2024-11-16T11:53:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:53, 16 November 2024
Line 12:		Line 12:
	Note that even with a significant amount of bending (easily visible by human eye in microscopy images) <br>		Note that even with a significant amount of bending (easily visible by human eye in microscopy images) <br>
	things like [[tether assisted assembly]] could still be viable. <br>		things like [[tether assisted assembly]] could still be viable. <br>
	Side note: For the tethers of this method zero stiffness ''IS'' desired. <br>		Side note: For the tethers of this method zero stiffness ''IS'' desired, <br>
	but the structure around must not loose all of its structural integrity and <br>		but the structure around must not loose all of its structural integrity and <br>
	feature some minimum amount of stiffness. <br>		feature some minimum amount of stiffness. <br>

Apm at 11:53, 16 November 2024

2024-11-16T11:53:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:53, 16 November 2024
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Still this is about how far one can go before (way) too much of stiffness is lost. <br>		Still this is about how far one can go before (way) too much of stiffness is lost. <br>

	~~Mote~~ that even with a significant amount of bending (easily visible by human eye in microscopy images) <br>		Note that even with a significant amount of bending (easily visible by human eye in microscopy images) <br>
	things like [[tether assisted assembly]] could still be viable. <br>		things like [[tether assisted assembly]] could still be viable. <br>
	Side note: For the tethers of this method zero stiffness ''IS'' desired. <br>		Side note: For the tethers of this method zero stiffness ''IS'' desired. <br>

Apm at 11:53, 16 November 2024

2024-11-16T11:53:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:53, 16 November 2024
Line 6:		Line 6:

	For homogeneous straight solid rods there is math for quantifying this. <br>		For homogeneous straight solid rods there is math for quantifying this. <br>
			'''The "persistence length" as is topic of this page.''' <br>
	Well not the point of loss of all stiffness but the point of a certain huge amount of bending. <br>		Well not the point of loss of all stiffness but the point of a certain huge amount of bending. <br>
	Still this is about how far one can go before (way) too much of stiffness is lost. <br>		Still this is about how far one can go before (way) too much of stiffness is lost. <br>

Apm at 11:52, 16 November 2024

2024-11-16T11:52:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:52, 16 November 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{wikitodo\|Maybe add an illustation of the concept.}}		{{wikitodo\|Maybe add an illustation of the concept.}}

	Especially softer, more elastic structures that are common with early foldamer technologies such as <br>		Especially softer, more elastic structures that are common with early [[foldamer]] technologies such as <br>
	3D [[structural DNA nanotechnology]] tend to bend a lot. <br>		3D [[structural DNA nanotechnology]] tend to bend a lot. <br>
	If improperly designed then so much so that effectively zero stiffness remains (where this is not so desired). <br>		If improperly designed then so much so that effectively zero stiffness remains (where this is not so desired). <br>

Apm: basic page

2024-11-16T11:51:46Z

basic page

New page

{{wikitodo|Maybe add an illustation of the concept.}}

Especially softer, more elastic structures that are common with early foldamer technologies such as 
3D [[structural DNA nanotechnology]] tend to bend a lot. 
If improperly designed then so much so that effectively zero stiffness remains (where this is not so desired). 

For homogeneous straight solid rods there is math for quantifying this. 
Well not the point of loss of all stiffness but the point of a certain huge amount of bending. 
Still this is about how far one can go before (way) too much of stiffness is lost. 

Mote that even with a significant amount of bending (easily visible by human eye in microscopy images) 
things like [[tether assisted assembly]] could still be viable. 
Side note: For the tethers of this method zero stiffness ''IS'' desired. 
but the structure around must not loose all of its structural integrity and 
feature some minimum amount of stiffness. 

Also very bulky structures can be made to barely flex at all 
finer details then integrated form siffer technologies: 
See: [[Foldamer technology stiffness nesting]] ( & [[Stiffness focusing]]) 

== Related ==

* [[Self-assemby]] & [[System complexity scaling of self-assembly]]
* 3D [[structural DNA nanotechnology]]
* [[Tether assisted assembly]]
* [[Foldamer printer]] & [[Robo approach]]
* [[Foldamer technology stiffness nesting]] & [[Stiffness focusing]]

== External links ==

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persistence_length

Persistence length - Revision history

Apm: /* Related */

Apm: /* Related */

Apm: /* Related */ added link to page * Circumsembly

Apm at 11:55, 16 November 2024

Apm at 11:53, 16 November 2024

Apm at 11:53, 16 November 2024

Apm at 11:53, 16 November 2024

Apm at 11:52, 16 November 2024

Apm: basic page

Apm: /* Related / added link to page Circumsembly