In place assembly - Revision history

Apm: /* Related / added RepRec pick and place robots

2022-05-20T16:13:20Z

Related: added * RepRec pick and place robots

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:13, 20 May 2022
Line 66:		Line 66:
	* [[Mechanosynthesis]]		* [[Mechanosynthesis]]
	* in place printing aka in one piece printing in todays (2018) 3D prining technology		* in place printing aka in one piece printing in todays (2018) 3D prining technology
			* [[RepRec pick and place robots]]

Apm: /* Blurring upwards and downwards */ completed wikitodo -- inserted Fractal growth speedup limit

2018-08-13T19:55:08Z

Blurring upwards and downwards: completed wikitodo -- inserted Fractal growth speedup limit

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:55, 13 August 2018
Line 24:		Line 24:
	* Blurring upwards: The upper assembly level doing what actually the lower should do.		* Blurring upwards: The upper assembly level doing what actually the lower should do.
	* Blurring downwards: The lower assembly level doing what actually the upper should do. <br>This links to the old outdated molecular assembler concept. Where the idea was that they would produce everything in place		* Blurring downwards: The lower assembly level doing what actually the upper should do. <br>This links to the old outdated molecular assembler concept. Where the idea was that they would produce everything in place
	with just one (or at best two) assembly levels involved. The main issue here (in this context) was inefficiency (the bigger the product gets the less surface you have left to work on even super complex dendridic retraction retraction channels don't solve the problem ~~{{wikitodo\|add link to this certain page}}~~ in case one really wants a fully solid block of product. Additionally there is the lack of specialization to standard parts that slows things down.		with just one (or at best two) assembly levels involved. The main issue here (in this context) was inefficiency (the bigger the product gets the less surface you have left to work on even super complex dendridic retraction retraction channels don't solve the problem (See: "[[Fractal growth speedup limit]]") in case one really wants a fully solid block of product. Additionally there is the lack of specialization to standard parts that slows things down.

Apm: /* Assambly level overlap - diminishing and vanishing at the bottom */ bold

2018-08-13T16:22:24Z

Assambly level overlap - diminishing and vanishing at the bottom: bold

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:22, 13 August 2018
Line 17:		Line 17:
	* (2) The necessity for quicker movements (due to the larger size gap between base parts - that is atoms - to product parts - that is crystolecules) and stiffer manipulators (molecular mills) does not allow the geometric freedom to assemble the freshly mechanosynthesized with the same mechanisms (specialized mills do not have enough DOFs and range of motion and the gripping capabilities to do more complicated part assemblies)		* (2) The necessity for quicker movements (due to the larger size gap between base parts - that is atoms - to product parts - that is crystolecules) and stiffer manipulators (molecular mills) does not allow the geometric freedom to assemble the freshly mechanosynthesized with the same mechanisms (specialized mills do not have enough DOFs and range of motion and the gripping capabilities to do more complicated part assemblies)

	As a side-note the second point also applies to todays (2018) 3D printing technology		As a side-note the second point also applies to todays (2018) 3D printing technology where <br>
	~~where~~ 3D printer mechanics would be very bad for pick and placer part assembly (and vice versa).		'''3D printer mechanics would be very bad for pick and placer part assembly (and vice versa)'''.

	== Blurring upwards and downwards ==		== Blurring upwards and downwards ==

Apm: /* Concrete discussion of the blurring of assembly levels */ elaborated why downward and not upward blurring ...

2018-08-13T16:19:51Z

Concrete discussion of the blurring of assembly levels: elaborated why downward and not upward blurring ...

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:19, 13 August 2018
Line 50:		Line 50:
	Note that '''out of place assembly''' is the norm. <br>		Note that '''out of place assembly''' is the norm. <br>
	That is: In case the assembly levels are properly separated and there is no blurring, one has out of place assembly.		That is: In case the assembly levels are properly separated and there is no blurring, one has out of place assembly.

			Meta-side-note: "''Downward''-blurring" is used here because what should be done at a specific assembly level is shoved down to the assembly level below.
			This may not be the best choice for naming. {{wikitodo\|check pros, cons, alternatives, ...}}

	=== Blurring assembly levels upwards ===		=== Blurring assembly levels upwards ===

Apm: /* Blurring assembly levels downwards */

2018-08-13T16:14:07Z

Blurring assembly levels downwards

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:14, 13 August 2018
Line 49:		Line 49:

	Note that '''out of place assembly''' is the norm. <br>		Note that '''out of place assembly''' is the norm. <br>
	That is in case the assembly levels are properly separated and there is no blurring, one has out of place assembly.		That is: In case the assembly levels are properly separated and there is no blurring, one has out of place assembly.

	=== Blurring assembly levels upwards ===		=== Blurring assembly levels upwards ===

Apm: /* Blurring assembly levels downwards */ added a linebreak

2018-08-13T16:13:44Z

Blurring assembly levels downwards: added a linebreak

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:13, 13 August 2018
Line 48:		Line 48:
	* '''In place microcomponent assembly:''' <br>The microcomponent assembly level is invading the dominion of the product(fragment) assembly level above. <br>This is very likely a good idea. After all this is the eraliest point where [[convergent assembly]] can be stopped for a practical nanofactory. So if the [[convergent assembly]] hierarchy is indeed stopped here, there is simply no other option than (massively parallel) in place assembly.		* '''In place microcomponent assembly:''' <br>The microcomponent assembly level is invading the dominion of the product(fragment) assembly level above. <br>This is very likely a good idea. After all this is the eraliest point where [[convergent assembly]] can be stopped for a practical nanofactory. So if the [[convergent assembly]] hierarchy is indeed stopped here, there is simply no other option than (massively parallel) in place assembly.

	Note that '''out of place assembly''' is the norm.		Note that '''out of place assembly''' is the norm. <br>
	That is in case the assembly levels are properly separated and there is no blurring, one has out of place assembly.		That is in case the assembly levels are properly separated and there is no blurring, one has out of place assembly.

Apm: /* Blurring assembly levels downwards */ made "out of place assembly" bold

2018-08-13T16:13:22Z

Blurring assembly levels downwards: made "out of place assembly" bold

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:13, 13 August 2018
Line 48:		Line 48:
	* '''In place microcomponent assembly:''' <br>The microcomponent assembly level is invading the dominion of the product(fragment) assembly level above. <br>This is very likely a good idea. After all this is the eraliest point where [[convergent assembly]] can be stopped for a practical nanofactory. So if the [[convergent assembly]] hierarchy is indeed stopped here, there is simply no other option than (massively parallel) in place assembly.		* '''In place microcomponent assembly:''' <br>The microcomponent assembly level is invading the dominion of the product(fragment) assembly level above. <br>This is very likely a good idea. After all this is the eraliest point where [[convergent assembly]] can be stopped for a practical nanofactory. So if the [[convergent assembly]] hierarchy is indeed stopped here, there is simply no other option than (massively parallel) in place assembly.

	Note that out of place assembly is the norm.		Note that '''out of place assembly''' is the norm.
	That is in case the assembly levels are properly separated and there is no blurring, one has out of place assembly.		That is in case the assembly levels are properly separated and there is no blurring, one has out of place assembly.

Apm: /* Blurring assembly levels downwards */ added "."'s

2018-08-13T16:12:11Z

Blurring assembly levels downwards: added "."'s

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:12, 13 August 2018
Line 44:		Line 44:
	=== Blurring assembly levels downwards ===		=== Blurring assembly levels downwards ===

	* '''In place mechanosynthesis:''' <br>The mechanosynthesis assembly level is invading the dominion of the crystolecule assembly level above. <br>This might not be such a good idea		* '''In place mechanosynthesis:''' <br>The mechanosynthesis assembly level is invading the dominion of the crystolecule assembly level above. <br>This might not be such a good idea.
	* '''In place crystolecule assembly:''' <br>The crystolecule assembly level is invading the dominion of the microcomponent assembly level above. <br>This might be useful depending on the application case		* '''In place crystolecule assembly:''' <br>The crystolecule assembly level is invading the dominion of the microcomponent assembly level above. <br>This might be useful depending on the application case.
	* '''In place microcomponent assembly:''' <br>The microcomponent assembly level is invading the dominion of the product(fragment) assembly level above. <br>This is very likely a good idea. After all this is the eraliest point where [[convergent assembly]] can be stopped for a practical nanofactory. So if the [[convergent assembly]] hierarchy is indeed stopped here, there is simply no other option than (massively parallel) in place assembly.		* '''In place microcomponent assembly:''' <br>The microcomponent assembly level is invading the dominion of the product(fragment) assembly level above. <br>This is very likely a good idea. After all this is the eraliest point where [[convergent assembly]] can be stopped for a practical nanofactory. So if the [[convergent assembly]] hierarchy is indeed stopped here, there is simply no other option than (massively parallel) in place assembly.

Apm: /* Blurring upwards and downwards */ big improvement - content and formatting

2018-08-13T16:11:35Z

Blurring upwards and downwards: big improvement - content and formatting

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:11, 13 August 2018
Line 40:		Line 40:
	In place mechanosynthesis of bigger interlocking assemblies of crystolecules may face similar hardships as in place 3D printing.		In place mechanosynthesis of bigger interlocking assemblies of crystolecules may face similar hardships as in place 3D printing.

	~~Blurring downwards:~~		== Concrete discussion of the blurring of assembly levels ==
	* In place mechanosynthesis might not be such a good idea
	* In place crystolecule assembly might be useful depending on the application case
	* In place microcomponent assembly is very likely a good idea. After all this is the ~~eraliest point where [[convergent~~ assembly~~]] can be stopped for a practical nanofactory.~~

	Blurring upwards:		=== Blurring assembly levels downwards ===
	....
			* '''In place mechanosynthesis:''' <br>The mechanosynthesis assembly level is invading the dominion of the crystolecule assembly level above. <br>This might not be such a good idea
			* '''In place crystolecule assembly:''' <br>The crystolecule assembly level is invading the dominion of the microcomponent assembly level above. <br>This might be useful depending on the application case
			* '''In place microcomponent assembly:''' <br>The microcomponent assembly level is invading the dominion of the product(fragment) assembly level above. <br>This is very likely a good idea. After all this is the eraliest point where [[convergent assembly]] can be stopped for a practical nanofactory. So if the [[convergent assembly]] hierarchy is indeed stopped here, there is simply no other option than (massively parallel) in place assembly.

			Note that out of place assembly is the norm.
			That is in case the assembly levels are properly separated and there is no blurring, one has out of place assembly.

			=== Blurring assembly levels upwards ===

			* '''The crystolecule assembly level doing mechanosynthesis:''' <br>This is maybe useful for very rare special parts. Or for fine after touches on standard parts.
			* '''The microcomponent assembly level doing crystolecule handling:''' ... Maybe this is not so useful?
			* '''The product(fragment) assembly level doing microcomponent handing:''' ??

	== Related ==		== Related ==

Apm: /* Blurring upwards and downwards */ corrected obvious mistake - this up and down blurring stuff is confusing - look into this deeper

2018-08-13T15:50:44Z

Blurring upwards and downwards: corrected obvious mistake - this up and down blurring stuff is confusing - look into this deeper

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:50, 13 August 2018
Line 22:		Line 22:
	== Blurring upwards and downwards ==		== Blurring upwards and downwards ==

	* Blurring upwards: The ~~lower~~ assembly level doing what actually the ~~upper~~ should do~~. The aforementioned scenario~~.		* Blurring upwards: The upper assembly level doing what actually the lower should do.
	* Blurring downwards: The lower assembly level doing what actually the upper should do. <br>This links to the old outdated molecular assembler concept. Where the idea was that they would produce everything in place		* Blurring downwards: The lower assembly level doing what actually the upper should do. <br>This links to the old outdated molecular assembler concept. Where the idea was that they would produce everything in place
	with just one (or at best two) assembly levels involved. The main issue here (in this context) was inefficiency (the bigger the product gets the less surface you have left to work on even super complex dendridic retraction retraction channels don't solve the problem {{wikitodo\|add link to this certain page}} in case one really wants a fully solid block of product. Additionally there is the lack of specialization to standard parts that slows things down.		with just one (or at best two) assembly levels involved. The main issue here (in this context) was inefficiency (the bigger the product gets the less surface you have left to work on even super complex dendridic retraction retraction channels don't solve the problem {{wikitodo\|add link to this certain page}} in case one really wants a fully solid block of product. Additionally there is the lack of specialization to standard parts that slows things down.