View source for Same frequencies for smaller machinery

{{stub}}
With frequencies kept constant for smaller machinery, speeds fall linearly for smaller machinery. <br>
This is leading to a bad unter-utilization of nanoscale machinery capabilities. <br>

Random example taking taking FFF 3D printing as a macroscale baseline for frequency.
* 100mm/s like average 3D printer speeds at 10cm=100mm scale (1Hz)
* => 1mm/s at 1mm scale => 1um/s at 1um scale
* => 10nm/s at 10nm scale

That is even slower than diffusion based transport in bilogical nanosystems. <br>
Proposed speeds for advanced [[diamondoid]]/[[gemstone]]-based nanosystems. 
In the book [[Nanosystems]] proposed where around 4mm/s at the smallest scales (~10nm). <br>
And natural would be to (non-gradually) move back up to at least 100mm/s when moving back up to the the macroscale (10cm=100mm). <br>

[[Same absolute speeds for smaller machinery]] seems to be a better baseline but also a bad one. <br>
Still giving a design space point far away from even the beginning of any halfway decent optimization. <br>

== Related pages ==

* Complement page to: [[Same absolute speeds for smaller machinery]]
* [[Convergent assembly]]