Difference between revisions of "Stiffness"

From apm
Jump to: navigation, search
(External links: added link to wikipedias page about persistence length)
Line 57: Line 57:
  
 
== External links ==
 
== External links ==
 +
 +
* Wikipedia: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persistence_length Persistence length]
  
 
Related pages from <br>Eric Drexler's blog: '''Metamodern''' – The Trajectory of Technology <br>
 
Related pages from <br>Eric Drexler's blog: '''Metamodern''' – The Trajectory of Technology <br>

Revision as of 12:05, 5 August 2022

This article is a stub. It needs to be expanded.
 the less soft the nanomachinery the less imprecise the mechanosynthesis

Gradually introducing sufficient stiffness into atomically precise structures is of key importance for bootstrapping the far term goal of advanced nanofactories through a series of earlier increasingly more powerful atomically precise productive nanosystems.

Sufficient stiffness (more precisely: lattice scaled stiffness) is:

  • necessary for sufficient suppression of thermal vibration amplitudes.
    First sufficiently below the size of pre-produced atomically precise blocks and self-alignment/self-centering slots.
    Later sufficiently below atom to atom distance to exponentially suppress misplacement errors.
  • necessary to archive atomically precise positioning capability not just topological atomic precision
  • necessary for making force applying mechanosynthesis possible
  • one reason for the choice of gemstone like compounds as good base material / far term target material

Sufficient lattice scaled stiffness for early low stiffness systems

Usage of self assembled atomically precise base parts (aka "vitamins") allow for less stringent conditions on stiffness. Only the lattice scaled stiffness must be sufficient for block based self centering assembly (which is not really callable "mechanosynthesis" yet).

(wiki-TODO: Add external link to lattice scaled stiffness explanation page.)

How stiffness scales with size

The scaling law for stiffness is such that smaller structures have lower stiffness ("softer"). (wiki-TODO: Add math and graph.) Nanoscale diamond e.g. has a compliance that when interpreted at the macroscale lies in a very intuitively understandable range.
(See: The feel of atoms#Softness)

Main page: Lower stiffness of smaller machinery

Influence of stiffness on manipulator design

The choice of geometric design of nano-manipulators must be taken such that the compliance of the material is compensated for. Long skinny serial mechanics robotic arms (like many industry robots on the macroscale) are a bad choice for the deep nanoscale. Bulky parallel mechanic manipulators are a good choice.

Influence of stiffness on friction

More stiffness causes less or harder to excite degrees of freedom for thermal motion.
This allow for lower levels of friction.
See: Friction in gem-gum technology

General

  • The SI unit of stiffness is newtons per square meter (N/m2)
  • The inverse of stiffness is called compliance. Not softness which would be the inverse of hardness.

Related


External links

Related pages from
Eric Drexler's blog: Metamodern – The Trajectory of Technology
Recovered with the internet archives wayback machine.
(More recovered pages from this blog can be found here: Eric Drexler's blog partially dug up from the Internet Archive)

  • Blogpost 2009-02-20: [1]
    "Nanomachines, Nanomaterials, and Klm"
    Subtitle: "Toward Advanced Nanotechnology: Nanomaterials (5)"
  • Blogpost 2009-02-15: [2].
    "Nanostructures, Nanomaterials, and Lattice-Scaled Stiffness"
    Subtitle: "Toward Advanced Nanotechnology: Nanomaterials (4)"
    (Note: the uncrecovered direct link [3] works for this specific post BUT
    many internal links are broken. Database damage presumably?)